The systematic review of clinical research papers is a labor-intensive and time-consuming process that often

GHBIO

05.05.2024

From Days to Seconds: ChatGPT's Breakthrough in Automating Scientific Systematic Reviews

Blue Flower
Blue Flower
Blue Flower
Automated Medical Screening

Automated Paper Screening for Clinical Reviews Using Large Language Models: Data Analysis Study

The systematic review of clinical research papers is a labor-intensive and time-consuming process that often involves the screening of thousands of titles and abstracts. The accuracy and efficiency of this process are critical for the quality of the review and subsequent health care decisions. Traditional methods rely heavily on human reviewers, often requiring a significant investment of time and resources.

Objective:This study aims to assess the performance of the OpenAI generative pretrained transformer (GPT) and GPT-4 application programming interfaces (APIs) in accurately and efficiently identifying relevant titles and abstracts from real-world clinical review data sets and comparing their performance against ground truth labeling by 2 independent human reviewers.

Methods:We introduce a novel workflow using the Chat GPT and GPT-4 APIs for screening titles and abstracts in clinical reviews. A Python script was created to make calls to the API with the screening criteria in natural language and a corpus of title and abstract data sets filtered by a minimum of 2 human reviewers. We compared the performance of our model against human-reviewed papers across 6 review papers, screening over 24,000 titles and abstracts.


AI

GHBIO

Ethics

Humanity

Presence and Impact